We all
have different abilities or strengths.
By definition, therefore, we all must have non-strengths or non-abilities. At some point, non-abilities are called
disabilities. Every non-ability and
disability is relative to some fictional definition of normally enabled, (i.e.,
normal ability). No one knows if they are
disabled because there is no such thing as normally enabled.
To
illustrate just how subjective disability is consider a few examples. We recently had a one day media flap
(something that has become a fixture of the 24-7 news cycle). It was about an Olympic sprinter who will be
running on prosthetic legs. Does the
absence of legs constitute a disability?
The sprinter felt not and the Olympic Committee agreed.
Consider
Stephen Hawking, a paraplegic and winner of a Nobel Prize in Physics. Einstein was probably dyslexic. Thomas Edison
was deaf or nearly so in at least one ear and his eating disorder went beyond eccentric. Moving away from science, we’ve had well-known
Presidents who were “disabled” (e.g., hard of hearing and almost wheelchair
bound). It isn’t at all hard to list
many “disabled” people who made historic contributions to just about every
field. They were able to contribute because they didn’t accept the idea that
they weren’t able.
Now that
seems harsh since the implication is that there is no such thing as
disabled. So, a disclosure is in
order. This isn’t all theoretical
because I’m officially (i.e., by SS standards) disabled. It is a difficulty I had to overcome my
entire working life, but curiosity got the better of me, so, I checked. My conclusion is that self-identification
plays a huge role in disability.
Disabilities
are real, but whether they are disabling in a career/employment sense is quite
subjective, subjective enough for economic conditions and political objectives
to swamp medical reality. I don’t
consider myself dumb, but according to the SS Administration, I wasn’t smart
enough to know I was disabled my entire career.
The alternative interpretation is that the SS Administration is
unqualified to assess disability. More
than likely neither the disabled nor the government is qualified to make the
judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment